Closed selimfirat closed 3 years ago
@selimfirat thanks for the note, I was able to reproduce this as well, and the paper is incorrect for this particular experiment. I plan to issue a revised version of the paper with this correction and another that has been found, but not sure on timing of when I'll get to that.
Thank you for sharing this wonderful work! In fact, I have succeeded to reproduce with higher scores :) This situation makes me wonder why this happens. Was there any project/data update or am I doing something wrong?
I followed the "To run with local or virtual environment" instructions in README.py without changing config.yaml since it says "to recreate the experiment from paper, leave as is". I obtain an absolute 3% more recall.
I obtain 0.87 precision and 0.83 recall, whereas in the paper, it is 87.5% precision and 80.0% recall.