Open rju opened 1 day ago
rju
commented
1 day ago author DaGeRe -- Tue, 16 Jan 2024 21:36:26 +0100
Since its an important point of comparison, I’ve implemented javassist first. Furthermore, I’ll merge DiSL into the branch, so MooBench experiments can be executed with this branch.
rju
commented
1 day ago author DaGeRe -- Tue, 16 Jan 2024 22:03:28 +0100
The branch basically works, and also basic MooBench measurements are possible.
Currently, this only takes the class name from the KIEKER_PATTERNS (environment variable) and afterwards checks whether the class from the pattern matches an instrumented class. This should be extended by:
Additionally, we need to discuss how to pass the patterns. Since javassist has no aop.xml, we’d need to build our own implementation here (which makes sense; currently, the aop.xml patterns and kieker PatternParser patterns are kind of parallel structures).
rju
commented
1 day ago author DaGeRe -- Fri, 19 Jan 2024 18:51:56 +0100
Javassist works now, and I’ve additionally created a simple ByteBuddy implementation: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/77847943/initializing-non-primtive-field-by-bytebuddy-in-aspect Unfortunately, I didn’t find a way to initialize the fields that Kieker needs, so I’ve created a stackoverflow question: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/77847943/initializing-non-primtive-field-by-bytebuddy-in-aspect But it seems like this isn’t possible yet.
rju
commented
1 day ago author DaGeRe -- Tue, 6 Aug 2024 10:53:50 +0200
For this ticket, only javassist is missing, but the merge is blocked by the BuildScript error (https://kieker-monitoring.atlassian.net/browse/KIEKER-1989 )
JIRA Issue: KIEKER-1973 Support ByteBuddy as Instrumentation Technology Original Reporter: David Georg Reichelt
Currently, Kieker probes can be injected via AspectJ, source instrumentation and DiSL (experimentally). Additionally, ByteBuddy should be supported.