Closed christoph-fricke closed 3 years ago
A rename proposed for #13 caused this problem, since "in" checks are not correctly refactored.
This PR also removes the "in" checks and just calls the method if it exists on the object.
A rename proposed for #13 caused this problem, since "in" checks are not correctly refactored.
This PR also removes the "in" checks and just calls the method if it exists on the object.