Closed timriot closed 11 years ago
I will begin looking into this much more deeply.
We don't even need tcp. We just need some kind of bridgetalk + kevlar.
Kilian C.
On Friday, October 19, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Tim Riot wrote:
I will begin looking into this much more deeply.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/kilianc/motherlover/issues/7#issuecomment-9592234).
Word. There must be a way.
-Tim
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Kilian Ciuffolo notifications@github.comwrote:
We don't even need tcp. We just need some kind of bridgetalk + kevlar.
Kilian C.
On Friday, October 19, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Tim Riot wrote:
I will begin looking into this much more deeply.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub ( https://github.com/kilianc/motherlover/issues/7#issuecomment-9592234).
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/kilianc/motherlover/issues/7#issuecomment-9592266.
Problems: Connection setup is a pain and requires several additional steps API to setup a password?
Questions: If this is for local machines only, why can't we have a separate, unencrypted server that is tied to localhost only and will not allow remote connections.