nested flat-routes not entirely BC behavior or documentation unclear?

[akomm]

I had:

• foo.bar/route.tsx
• foo.bar.$stuff.some/route.tsx
• foo.bar.$stuff.more/route.tsx

Changing to

• foo.bar/route.tsx
• foo.bar.$stuff+/some/route.tsx
• foo.bar.$stuff+/more/route.tsx

The route foo.bar/route.tsx was previously considered layout, now becomes separate route. The nested folder flat-route looked to me like something that does not force me to make to many nested levels, because as per logic documented the first and the second should be equivalent.

[akomm]

I could solve the issue, it was some confusion regarding the semantics in the documentation.