Closed kimtonyhyun closed 5 years ago
Cell 80 (Rsq=0.4554):
Raster:
Cell 140 (Rsq=0.6249):
Raster:
Cell 149 (Rsq=0.7708):
Raster:
Cell 205 (Rsq=0.7092): Raster:
Cell 209 (Rsq=0.5398): Raster:
Cell 270 (Rsq=0.7191): Raster:
Cell 357 (Rsq=0.6508): Raster:
In #232, I described a particular class of deviation between raw traces and the CPD-fitted traces, where the latter predicts activity whereas the actual data is silent. Let me call these cases "spurious fitted activity." Here, I want to give additional examples of this phenomenon.
I manually compared
X
andXest
usingeval_fit
(with the "Signed diff" score), and found about ~20 example cells with spurious fitted activity (out of 487 total cells). I am going to highlight a few examples here. Generally, I think the example show: