search

kingjr / meg_expectation_p3

GNU General Public License v3.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

New nested_analysis bugs #16

Open gmeade opened 8 years ago

gmeade commented 8 years ago

Hey,

screen shot 2015-10-29 at 13 18 19

Sooo... the new nested_analysis function now bugs on all of the simple seen vs. unseen contrasts, which are defined something like this:

contrast_seen_all = analysis('seen_all', 'categorize', condition='seen')

It appears to have something to do with the fact that the condition is defined as strings ('seen' or 'unseen'), but there doesn't seem to be an easy fix like there was yesterday with the seen=="%s". Any suggestions?

kingjr commented 8 years ago

Ok, let's see this on teamviewer

On 29 October 2015 at 16:20, gmeade notifications@github.com wrote:

Hey,

[image: screen shot 2015-10-29 at 13 18 19] https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/11678885/10830920/8fd793ba-7e3f-11e5-9773-d3e241e2482b.png

Sooo... the new nested_analysis function now bugs on all of the simple seen vs. unseen contrasts, which are defined something like this:

contrast_seen_all = analysis('seen_all', 'categorize', condition='seen')

It appears to have something to do with the fact that the condition is defined as strings ('seen' or 'unseen'), but there doesn't seem to be an easy fix like there was yesterday with the seen=="%s". Any suggestions?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/kingjr/meg_expectation_p3/issues/16.

gmeade commented 8 years ago

Sorry, I’m just seeing this. Are you still around?

On 29 Oct 2015, at 13:44, Jean-Rémi KING notifications@github.com wrote:

Ok, let's see this on teamviewer

On 29 October 2015 at 16:20, gmeade notifications@github.com wrote:

Hey,

[image: screen shot 2015-10-29 at 13 18 19] https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/11678885/10830920/8fd793ba-7e3f-11e5-9773-d3e241e2482b.png

Sooo... the new nested_analysis function now bugs on all of the simple seen vs. unseen contrasts, which are defined something like this:

contrast_seen_all = analysis('seen_all', 'categorize', condition='seen')

It appears to have something to do with the fact that the condition is defined as strings ('seen' or 'unseen'), but there doesn't seem to be an easy fix like there was yesterday with the seen=="%s". Any suggestions?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/kingjr/meg_expectation_p3/issues/16.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.