Closed matbesancon closed 4 years ago
Linking to the review: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1912
We had a lot of options in terms of naming this package but we preferred ScenTrees
as it is unique and it kind of explains more to what we are doing.
The Project.toml doesn't seem to follow Pkg generated style, perform:
modifies the order of packages in Project.toml
The package itself should be referenced in the documentation's project, otherwise, when
activate
-ing the docs/Project.toml, there is no ScenTrees in the environment.Following Julia's guidelines on package names,
ScenarioTrees.jl
might be a more explicit name compared to ScenTrees.jl, this is up to you and won't be a blocking issue for the JOSS review