Open julianredmond opened 4 years ago
0 points | 1 points | 2 points | 3 points | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Accessibility | No considerations | Added some alt attributes, nothing else | Just the basics: alt attributes, roles | Accessibility is well considered and tested |
Code quality | Barely started | Indentation is barely existent, lots of validation errors, very poor semantics | Decent indentation, just a couple validation errors, decent semantics | Well indented, fully valid, good semantics |
Responsiveness | Not responsive at all | A bit of responsiveness | Mostly responsive, most things look correct | Fully responsive, everything looks great at all sizes |
Performance | Super slow | Not fast | Pretty quick | Extremely fast |
Content | No real content | About half real content | Most of the content is real | All real, quality content |
14/15
Over all, we created a high quality web application. We believe we should receive full marks for all areas in the rubric, except for Accessibility. Due to timing issues, we weren't able to include all of the accessibility elements.
We worked well as a team, collaborating in and out of class. Work was split, and slack was picked up where necessary.