Closed JayChoi1736 closed 1 year ago
@JayChoi1736 Did you know this statement in KIP-82?
In addition to changing the reward structure, this renewal will include burning the gas fee up to a threshold which is the size of block proposer reward. If the gas fee exceeds the threshold, remaining amount is rewarded to the block proposer. The KGF and KIR portion will be excluded from the gas fee.
@JayChoi1736 Did you know this statement in KIP-82?
In addition to changing the reward structure, this renewal will include burning the gas fee up to a threshold which is the size of block proposer reward. If the gas fee exceeds the threshold, remaining amount is rewarded to the block proposer. The KGF and KIR portion will be excluded from the gas fee.
yes. txfee burn scenario has been tested in both case.
Fixes
Caution
The block number at which governance voting is applied is different between v1.9.1 and v1.10.1. However, before Kore Hardfork, it is difficult to check which version of klaytn node the block was created on at the Rosetta Client Therefore, it is assumed that governance voting prior to Kore Hardfork was conducted in versions prior to v1.9.1, and governance voting after Kore Hardfork is assumed to be conducted in versions 1.10.1 or later.
Localnet Test
Environment Klaytn : v1.10.1 Hardforks :
Baobab Test