Closed LeeThompson closed 2 years ago
Two possible alternatives that avoid the need to implement a lot of existing functionality from other editors/IDE's:
Both options offer users all of the IDE options without having to develop maintain them.
That would work too.
(I'm kinda doing that now manually, I copy the passage and paste it in Notepad++ (with a sugarcube language addon), work on it, then paste it back in the twine editor.)
Syntax Highlighting in passage editor
Because things like macro syntax are controlled by each Story Format Developer, currently its their responsibility to implement features like Syntax Highlighting for their format, and so far only the Developer of Harlowe has done so.
I'm closing this because it's several different suggestions (and thus impossible to close unless we implement all of them). Noting that several of these suggestions (customizable font, syntax highlighting) have been implemented in 2.4.
It would be nice if the editor would offer more IDE features: