satello
commented
4 years ago I think this is a good idea but we would want to put some design thought into it before implementing.
Some questions and considerations I have:
- Organizationally what makes the most sense for Court? Are we prioritizing filters for what jurors would want?
- In terms of the design do we stuff more filters onto the cases page or is there different pages for "My Cases" and "All Cases"? Should filters be persistent?
- This could create problems in terms of loading times and infura calls. There isn't an efficient way to get many disputes in one call at the moment. We could use a smart contract that allows for querying and batch returning disputes.
- This might be more useful as an external application than as added functionality in Court (perhaps linked to from Court?). You cannot appeal/crowdfund within Court so it would be bulky to use court to see all dispute if you are a funder. Do we want to turn Court into a monolithic application that serves as the hub of Kleros for all interested parties, or should it be kept as just a place for jurors? In the event that we want to expand Court to serve different user bases we might want to completely re-do the home page to be less juror specific.
It would be very useful to let users display all disputes and filter them by period. For example, a user can take a look for appeal funding opportunities.