Closed Harman-singh-waraich closed 1 month ago
The changes involve an update to the DistributeRewards
component in the DistributeRewards.tsx
file. The modification specifically alters the logic in the loop that processes the rounds
array. The third value in the args
array is now calculated by doubling the round.nbVotes
using BigInt(2)
, which affects the data sent to the setContractConfigs
function.
Files | Change Summary |
---|---|
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/MaintenanceButtons/DistributeRewards.tsx |
Updated logic in the DistributeRewards component to double round.nbVotes before pushing to argsArr . |
In the meadow where votes do play,
A rabbit found a new way to sway.
Doubling the cheers with a hop and a twirl,
Rewards now shine in a vibrant whirl.
With every round, the joy expands,
Hopping along with our clever plans! πβ¨
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/MaintenanceButtons/DistributeRewards.tsx (1)
`55-58`: _:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Clarify the rationale for doubling the number of votes** The change to multiply `round.nbVotes` by `BigInt(2)` aligns with the PR objective of modifying the number of iterations passed to the execute function. However, a few points need clarification: 1. Could you elaborate on why doubling the number of votes is necessary? This change might have significant implications on the contract's behavior. 2. How does this change interact with the contract's logic, especially in cases where coherence is not a factor? 3. Are there any potential edge cases where doubling the votes could lead to unexpected results? Consider adding a comment to explain the reasoning behind this change, for example: ```typescript args: [ BigInt(id), BigInt(round.id.split("-")[1]), // Doubling nbVotes as the contract caps it to the appropriate value BigInt(round.nbVotes) * BigInt(2) ], ``` It's crucial to verify that this change is compatible with the contract implementation. Could you provide the relevant contract code or documentation that supports this modification? This will help ensure that the contract indeed handles the doubled value as expected.
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | af25fb295758a824ebc32a859ce3b2c18ba0c6d5 |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-university/deploys/66f5552cb95eac0008f159ad |
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | af25fb295758a824ebc32a859ce3b2c18ba0c6d5 |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-neo/deploys/66f5552cb95eac0008f159af |
Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-1700--kleros-v2-neo.netlify.app |
Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | af25fb295758a824ebc32a859ce3b2c18ba0c6d5 |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/kleros-v2-testnet/deploys/66f5552b20c72e0008ebf6d9 |
Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-1700--kleros-v2-testnet.netlify.app |
Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.
Code Climate has analyzed commit af25fb29 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.
View more on Code Climate.
Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code
end
is2*nbVotes
ornbVotes
if coherent, so even if we pass2*nbVotes
in case of coherent it will cap it itself tonbVotes
. Correct me if i am wrong π€PR-Codex overview
This PR modifies the calculation of vote rewards in the
DistributeRewards.tsx
file by multiplying the number of votes by2
before pushing the arguments toargsArr
.Detailed summary
argsArr.push
method to multiplyBigInt(round.nbVotes)
byBigInt(2)
.argsArr.push
for improved readability.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes