Closed dmcglinn closed 11 years ago
It's correct in that the algorithm does what it's supposed to. But, by removing several lines of 'if' statements at the bottom (i.e. if q == 1, if q > 0), and then replacing 'while q > 1:' with 'while q > 0:', things look much cleaner. Thanks, Dan.
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Dan McGlinn notifications@github.comwrote:
All of the random partition algos have a similar while statement:
while q > 1: do a bunch of stuff
but with divide_and_conquer() the while statement is
while q > 0:
Is this correct, and change we possibly change the code to make the algos more consistent with each other?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/klocey/partitions/issues/5 .
All of the random partition algos have a similar while statement:
while q > 0: do a bunch of stuff
but with top_down() the while statement is
while q > 1:
Is this correct, and change we possibly change the code to make the algos more consistent with each other?