Closed sophauer closed 8 months ago
每个Core执行一个naiveproxy线程,全listen在同一个1080端口
Why for that?
每个Core执行一个naiveproxy线程,全listen在同一个1080端口
Why for that?
旁路由支撑一百多台电脑翻墙,单一个naiveproxy只用一个CPU Core,负载太高., 所以用4个线程.,listten在同一个端口.可以发挥软路由最大性能
No possible. Different processes cannot use the same TCP port.
No possible. Different processes cannot use the same TCP port.
ss-libev,xray.v2ray,都有这个功能
Because naiveproxy does not support the
Oh, it looks like the option has been added to support in the latest commit.SO_REUSEPORT
option.
~Because naiveproxy does not support the
SO_REUSEPORT
option.~ Oh, it looks like the option has been added to support in the latest commit.
yes,我也是刚看到,但是似乎还没更新下载.只能自己compile
Run 8 workers for port 1080:
for i in $(seq 8); do
./naive --listen=socks://0.0.0.0:1080 &
done
It might be better if you pin the process to a specific core such as:
for i in $(seq 8); do
taskset -c $i ./naive --listen=socks://0.0.0.0:1080 &
done
Ref: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33994983/assigning-a-cpu-core-to-a-process-linux
I'm wondering if it would be better (or possible) to harness multiple CPU core by multi-threading within naiveproxy?
Edit: I found https://github.com/valyala/fasthttp/issues/23
. Looks like this fork & port reusing approach should be a good practice.
我想把旁路由的CPU效能发挥起来,每个Core执行一个naiveproxy线程,全listen在同一个1080端口 但貌似naiveproxy的usage文档里找不到关于port reuse的描述
请问是否不支持单端口复用? 如果是,有没有其他路线可以实现?