Closed mxmilkiib closed 10 months ago
No, the alternative qt replaced it with isn't good enough. It's missing some important features, don't remember exactly what it was right now. And I don't think the alternative compiles under mingw. Also, qt5webkit is still being developed, although not muchm but there's even a branch for qt6 at least.
You can try changing the USE_QWEBENGINE macro in the code though. It might still work using the other one.
(I'll see if I can make it compile again, but I won't enable it by default)
It still compiles without any changes. :-) Just Change USE_QWEBENGINE to 1, add Qt5WebEngine, Qt5WebEngineCore, Qt5WebEngineWidgets to Makefile.Qt, etc. You can't zoom in on the faust graph in the FaustDev instrument though, I think that's the only reason for not using it. I'll see if I can make it so that you only can set an environment variable if you want to use qwebengine instead of qtwebkit.
That would be marvelous, thank you! Might upstream have an opinion on reimplementing that lacking feature? Cheers again.
I've added option to set the environment variable USE_QWEBENGINE to 1 to use qwebengine instead of qtwebkit, but the dsp graph in the faust instrument is quite useless when you do that.
I'm not sure, but I don't think Qt switched to qwebengine because it's better or newer.
Seems like I forgot to comment on this. But it should be fixed now.
There is no longer a binary qt5webkit package for Arch, and there hasn't been for a while now, and it takes an incredibly long time to compile.
Will moving on from using it be in the future of Radium?