What would you like to be added:
We have now used codecov for coverage reporting of go code. #360
codecov should also work for coverage reporting of c code. Hopefully, when doing c code coverage checking in the future, codecov can also be used directly to avoid redundancy
Why is this needed:
What would you like to be added: We have now used codecov for coverage reporting of go code. #360 codecov should also work for coverage reporting of c code. Hopefully, when doing c code coverage checking in the future, codecov can also be used directly to avoid redundancy Why is this needed: