Closed mmhat closed 4 years ago
Sounds great! Could we scope the issue down to "test pretty-printing" and open new issues for other possible improvements? Otherwise we'd never be able to close this issue - the test suite could always be improved :)
Possibly dumb question, why is TemplateHaskell required for step 2 instead of discovering the files at runtime?
Your right, I changed the title and 2. of the issue.
While working on #24 it turned out that the current test suite performed poorly. Proposal:
This is of course only for those tests involving pretty printing; we can keep the existing unit tests as they are. Additionally we could fuzzy test the implementation with QuickCheck.