Open Christovis opened 2 years ago
Thank you for your comments, I will check the feedback and incorporate it in the design.
Also, another thing I would like to ask: I haven't mentioned the institutions that are involved in the research yet. Should I include this information or it is not necessary at the moment?
Thank you, have a great rest of the day!
What institutions do you mean? I am not sure about that. Maybe Vitor has an idea how to go about this.
I was mainly talking about the Institute for Advanced Study and the University of Amsterdam. I will also ask Vitor tomorrow.
Simply adding UvA should be sufficient.
You can add both IvI and IAS.
In order to answer to the research questions, the following supporting sub-questions are formulated
Maybe rephrase as:To facilitate the investigation, we populate intermediate goals underneath this overarching research question which we formulate as follows:
Therefore, much interest has been shown in energy transition from policy makers, governments and academics, due to its environmental efficiency [9]
To me it sounds like 'the broader society is interested in energy transition due to its environmental efficiency', which seems odd (transition != the state of env. efficiency we aim for ?). Could you maybe reword this a bit.For instance, Keller, organises the models in three different types [1] depending on their functionalities.
If those three types can be listed in a concise manner, I would do so. Since it is mentioned that there are three types one would like to know what they are.I will try to add more things later today.