Closed dlau closed 8 years ago
Honestly I'm fine with how things are.
if (!opts.onError) throw parsingError; opts.onError(parsingError, this);
I don't like this version because the user can send stuff like onError = {} and it will throw an error.
Now about the brackets I see there are a lot of opinionated people. I invite them to create a PR with less lines.
That's just enough. Then just one if check would work.
I think @dlau should start use some extend package for so many options.
edit: @unDemian agree.
@tunnckoCore You are trying to optimize the use of brackets but you have 2 conditionals. One for checking the type then one for checking the true / false value. I did that with one check.
I don't really have time for this. If you like that short catch so much please push the code here. I tried helping but I really don't have time for this kind of "conflicts".
Have a great day
I don't have problems, it's not my package anymore. I have more stable and older package, with much more features and great code.
One for checking the type then one for checking the true / false value.
I just want to allow users to not have problems if onError
or onerror
is given. In anyway, i don't think it is needed et al, because koa has onerror
.
Following up on #41 -
Opinions/objections?