slight documentation error

[petaflot]

https://www.shellcheck.net/ says:

You can cabal, apt, dnf, pkg or brew install it locally right now. 

this should be

You can cabal, apt, dnf, pkg, brew or emerge install it locally right now. 

[TinCanTech]

@petaflot emerge is the Gentoo package manager.

[petaflot]

@TinCanTech I am fully aware of that.. but how is it relevant?

I mean, is it specified that apt is the package manager for all debian-derivates?

[TinCanTech]

Ha, for some reason i read this as remove: emerge not add: emerge. Sorry about that!

[petaflot]

crazy how we all can sometimes read or hear the exact opposite of a message. no problem, and I'm glad you're not one of those who will start being aggressive when they realize they made a silly mistake.

ps: cool nick :-)

[petaflot]

also and while I'm at it, on Gentoo dev-util/shellcheck has a massive load of masked dependencies, but there is also a dev-util/shellcheck-bin package :-] I suppose it may be worth to mention.

[port19x]

I think it's pretty silly to exhaustively list all available native packages for the most starred haskell project on github that exists in every repo under the sun. It would be a lot more sensible to just remove that line on the website and use a repology badge for the readme instead of listing each and every package manager under the sun.

just look at this madness


[petaflot]

yeah. better write sth like "most distros have it packaged" and add a link to "this madness" - or, as you stated, the "repology badge" (I didn't know that existed until now)