Closed yangwao closed 3 months ago
ASSIGNED - @cryptodamsky π LOCKED -> Thursday, August 25th 2022, 15:31:42 UTC -> 24 hours
ASSIGNMENT EXPIRED - @cryptodamsky has been unassigned.
This could be useful, finally got around to fix it properly, will be updated at Sundays from now on:
https://github.com/kodadot/nft-gallery/blob/main/BURN_RATE.md https://github.com/kodadot/nft-gallery/blob/main/LEADERBOARD.md
lmk if you need help with any data regarding the development :)
Any news on this one?
Any news on this one?
Need to write the proposal imo.
but thinking maybe some testimonials/survey from contributors would be worthy (cc @yangwao)
This is not just about writing proposal, but more of a putting together what was done and what actually served the "public good".
Since the amount of PRs doesnt count, it has to be categorized based on components added/edited.
Letβs say we had explorer which is now much better - all the issues which made the explorer better have to be put together in some understandable way, so the kusama voters can click on it and have a look.
Which obviously has to be done by a tech person, i canβt do this.
However, we can have a call setup specifically for this topic, but in the current state of kusama governance, itβs gonna be a bit tricky imo.
However, we can have a call setup specifically for this topic
yup, Monday 16/1 3pm works or after group call, let's say at 5pm
Mark is really impatient for our proposal to vote aye for rmrk2 retroactive funding. https://twitter.com/mark_ember_ryan/status/1644385736211443713
Meanwhile https://kusama.polkassembly.io/post/2575
what is the status with this issue?
what is the status with this issue?
We would be very happy if you would drop supportive comment here: https://kusama.polkassembly.io/post/2575
ποΈ π ποΈ https://kusama.polkassembly.io/referenda/220
@kodadot/internal can I ask you to drop an AYE vote? π₯Ί also small amount with 1x-2x conviction would make a difference
@JustLuuuu wrote a really good article how to vote Voting: Support KodaDot's RMRK2 proposal
We will have Twitter spaces as I think validators are fear of price drop or whatever is reason they are voting NAY.
https://kusama.polkassembly.io/referenda/220#cCfZhwvAvsnxgzrWjxo9
We will have Twitter spaces as I think validators are fear of price drop or whatever is reason they are voting NAY.
https://kusama.polkassembly.io/referenda/220#cCfZhwvAvsnxgzrWjxo9
@yangwao
our activity page
points to the wrong url here
It would be nice to drive more complex issues, faster. So the idea would be to ask KSM Treasury to drive some higher bounties for development to π pick a particular one and develop them it way faster &c
In some sense, parachains maintenance has its own costs as being onboarding "infrastructure" to further drive stuff and bootstrap things faster in time as we've effectively demonstrated the system with over $180k paid bounties in our 1500+ pull-requests
I guess as we are doing public good. In best intent of treasury is to sponsor our work as we are trying to bring attention to Polkadot & Kusama network, onboarding frontend developers, learning them about particular NFT stuff and designing components for others to re-use/recycle for their own purpose.
Among other stats
βοΈ 300+ π΄ 200+ π₯ 70+ π 100+ pull requests on a monthly average, sometimes even more β Anyone can join and participate