Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
We could do that with separately declared inner classes, will look into it
if/when we
find time.
Original comment by aragos
on 3 Jun 2010 at 5:21
I think it's easier than that - just use the raw type of the binding. See the
attached patch in issue 110 (sorry about two issues in one patch). I patched
it in,
and the SoYC report is now meaningful.
On the downside, this does register the same class name for multiple split
points if
you have annotated AsyncProviders or AsyncProviders for generic types - I don't
know
if GWT allows that or not. If it does, I think this is still a significant
improvement over the state of affairs.
Original comment by awi...@google.com
on 3 Jun 2010 at 8:54
I'll use the patch for 110 to upload a codereview, adapted to the current state
of the project.
Original comment by aragos
on 21 Jan 2011 at 9:36
Patch submitted for review at http://codereview.appspot.com/4038043.
Original comment by aragos
on 21 Jan 2011 at 9:53
Patch committed in r160.
Original comment by aragos
on 21 Jan 2011 at 11:35
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
awi...@google.com
on 3 Jun 2010 at 5:11