Open gyarnet opened 1 month ago
How did you correct it?
How did you correct it?
remove the R_k in the 171 line
I think the implementation is correct. You can confirm the SE3 derivatives by seeing the GTSAM code: https://github.com/borglab/gtsam/blob/d48b1fc8402e28d5b6af8f59cce8dbe87e66cf0c/gtsam/geometry/Pose3.cpp#L353.
thanks for your answer, I mistakenly take the gtsam::Pose3 as SO(3) + R3 instead of SE(3). I learn a lot from your code.
the jacobi in line 171 is wrong, but if i correct it, the optimization is worse.