We are adding the ability for the mempool to return the current nonce in the mempool. With this, the CLI can create sequential transactions prior to them being included in a block.
The CLI should call get_pending_nonce, using it if it exists, otherwise using get_current_nonce from chain.
Is there an existing issue for this?
New feature
We are adding the ability for the mempool to return the current nonce in the mempool. With this, the CLI can create sequential transactions prior to them being included in a block.
The CLI should call
get_pending_nonce
, using it if it exists, otherwise usingget_current_nonce
from chain.Anything else?
No response