Previously, accessors were being generated when adding a single constructor to an open type (since all of the added constructors had the same fields), creating a dummy constructor with no fields is a workaround, but the real fix is to not generate accessors for open or extend types.
daanx
commented
10 months ago
Previously, accessors were being generated when adding a single constructor to an open type (since all of the added constructors had the same fields), creating a dummy constructor with no fields is a workaround, but the real fix is to not generate accessors for open or extend types.