Closed Dev-iL closed 7 years ago
Hi, feel free to make a pull request.
But I would first wait for the final release.
v2 is released as of 3 days ago: https://github.com/ReactiveX/RxJava/releases/tag/v2.0.0
great, I will take a look! :)
Hi, any news about rxjava2 support? :-)
I finally decided how to make the transition correctly (and accumulated some experience using rx2 as well). So I target next week for releasing rx2-based artifacts.
Hey @konmik,
Do you need any specific help with this task?
Hey, this week I'm releasing the beta. The job is already 90% done, all tests pass.
It took longer than expected though. :D
Thanks for pinging me, btw!
'info.android15.nucleus5:nucleus:5.0.0-beta1' was just released and will be available in a few hours on maven central.
The new package name is nucleus5, branch is https://github.com/konmik/nucleus/tree/rx2.
All examples were updated.
Did anyone try it? :D
Any issues?
Is it ok to mention the build on the main page?
I am really busy this month, I'll definitely try it! And as soon as possible I'll give you feedback
Thanks @konmik - I'll try it soon and let you know
Tested all day long, everything seems fine for me! Thanks for your work @konmik
Hi there :) Thanks for the work @konmik ! Everything works fine, but I have a question regarding the Flowable class: will it be supported for the restartable methods ?
any updates on this?
No complains so far, use it! :)
@konmik https://github.com/konmik/nucleus/issues/111#issuecomment-293505584 sounds like a complaint ;)
I consider flowable to be an optional stream type that is easy to convert into observable. Otherwise we would need to implement restartables for all rxjava stream types, too much of pointless work. You can easily write your own function that will convert stream types you need automatically.
@konmik maybe you should update readme for better orientation for new users. Instead of compile 'info.android15.nucleus5:nucleus:5.0.0-beta' would be better to have there compile 'info.android15.nucleus5:nucleus:5.0.0-beta1'
I am finally going to test the update! :-)
@konmik "I consider flowable to be an optional stream type that is easy to convert into observable".
I do not believe this is so simple, the Flowable
object in Rxjava2 allows us to handle the concept of back pressure. Using .toObeservable()
on these objects converts them into a non-backpressured Observable
. I agree that this would be arduous work, but not pointless.
Hello Konstantin,
Do your long-term plans for the library include the adoption of RxJava v2? It had recently reached RC1, which means the API should be quite stable by now.
If yes, perhaps there's sense in creating another branch of nucleus containing preparations/adaptations for the new RxJava?
I might be able to help with some crude initial conversion if needed.