Open annblackz opened 8 years ago
this may have changed from when you posted this question, but I believe the AC now takes into account male and female samples.
Your example is in the PAR#2
See another example: http://exac.broadinstitute.org/variant/X-70328185-C-T
which has 86,817 allleles.
Thank you, yes - I posted my original question in 2016.
Ann
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:50 AM Robert Sicko notifications@github.com wrote:
this may have changed from when you posted this question, but I believe the AC now takes into account male and female samples.
Your example is in the PAR#2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/grc/human
See another example: http://exac.broadinstitute.org/variant/X-70328185-C-T
which has 86,817 allleles.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/konradjk/exac_browser/issues/276#issuecomment-364507438, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFBbF328Wd7ZhU1UiIwPrjG1rsarBlVPks5tTIVmgaJpZM4JrMvX .
Good morning,
We noticed that the allele numbers for SNPs in chrX do not appear to take account of the gender of the sample. I was assuming the maximum AN would be 2(Number of Female Samples) + (Number of Male Samples). Instead, it appears to be 2 (Number of total samples).
For example:
http://exac.broadinstitute.org/variant/X-155235086-T-C
I was hoping someone might be able to provide some additional information as to how AN for chr X in ExAC data should be used?
Thanks so much,
Ann Black-Ziegelbein