Closed tbm closed 1 year ago
Didn't really think about it, MIT OR Apache-2.0
maybe? TBH i never really expected any reuse of that code
It's just good hygiene to add a license since the way copyright works by default all rights are reserved.
MIT / Apache-2.0 sounds fine. IT would be great if you could add it somewhere explicitly. Thanks
TBH i never really expected any reuse of that code
It's not just about reuse, it's also about use by you.
(Usual legal disclaimer of "I'm not a lawyer")
Anyone can contribute the code. However, you do not hold the copyright to that code, because there is no license. So that means you do not have the right to use the code people contributed.
The way to fix the current situation is make everyone who contributed agree on the new license.
Since I contributed quite some of the current code: I would be more than fine with and FSF/OSI approved license. :)
BSD+Patent it is then
Thanks for writing this bot!
I don't see license information anywhere. Can you please add a license.