search

konstin / poc-monotrail

Proof Of Concept for python package management without virtualenvs
25 stars 4 forks source link

Release CI for crates #59

Open cnpryer opened 1 year ago

cnpryer commented 1 year ago

As a #53 follow up I figured I could create this issue.

A few questions:

  1. Do we want to give install-wheel-rs the same CI?
  2. Is install-wheel-rs a monotrail utility? What's the difference between a crate like install-wheel-rs and monotrail-utils?
konstin commented 1 year ago

Do we want to give install-wheel-rs the same CI?

install-wheel-rs has a bunch of test on its own and some integrated through monotrail and they should already run on CI. If any are missing, we should add them to CI

Is install-wheel-rs a monotrail utility? What's the difference between a crate like install-wheel-rs and monotrail-utils?

My idea was that you could pick up install-wheel-rs as a faster replacement for pip or installer even if you don't use pip at all, so it's a separate create with its own pypi page and everything. monotrail-utils is something still to be shaped by the requirements of rye and others, i don't have any strong idea of what should or shouldn't be in there and i'm happy to adapt the crate structure to user demand