Multiple delivery client factory

[Simply007]

Motivation

Fixes #312 (replaced #333)

DEVREL-601

TODO

• [x] Adjust documentation

Checklist

• [ ] Code follows coding conventions held in this repo
• [ ] Automated tests have been added
• [ ] Tests are passing
• [ ] Docs have been updated (if applicable)
• [ ] Temporary settings (e.g. variables used during development and testing) have been reverted to defaults

How to test

If manual testing is required, what are the steps?

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #347 (e564a2f) into master (2bad3d2) will decrease coverage by 0.05%. The diff coverage is 86.56%.

:exclamation: Current head e564a2f differs from pull request most recent head 14f16f1. Consider uploading reports for the commit 14f16f1 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #347      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.66%   88.60%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         120      122       +2     
  Lines        2585     2651      +66     
  Branches      318      329      +11     
==========================================
+ Hits         2292     2349      +57     
- Misses        166      172       +6     
- Partials      127      130       +3     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...very.Abstractions/Configuration/DeliveryOptions.cs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ontent.Ai.Delivery.Caching/DeliveryCacheOptions.cs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ndencyInjection/NamedDeliveryClientCacheFactory.cs	84.44% <ø> (ø)
...n/Builders/MultipleDeliveryClientFactoryBuilder.cs	75.67% <75.67%> (ø)
...njection/Extensions/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs	94.28% <100.00%> (+0.73%)	:arrow_up:
...pendencyInjection/MultipleDeliveryClientFactory.cs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
....DependencyInjection/NamedDeliveryClientFactory.cs	93.18% <100.00%> (ø)

:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[Simply007]

One last question - MultipleDleiveryClientFactory is OK?

[Simply007]

Went through the comments -> is that alright @gormal?

[gormal]

Went through the comments -> is that alright @gormal?

Just nitpicking about formatting, please have a look.