Open rromannissen opened 2 weeks ago
This issue is currently awaiting triage.
If contributors determine this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted
label and provide further guidance.
The triage/accepted
label can be added by org members.
What is the problem?
There is no way for an organization to enforce certain migration paths for applications associated with a certain archetype to land on specific target platforms. This allows migrators to explore migration paths that are not sanctioned by the organization, opening up the door for runtime/platforms and technology stacks that don't meet the corporate policy.
Why is this a problem?
After interviewing several large organizations, it has been revealed that modernization projects are perceived by them as an opportunity to further standardize the application landscape, narrowing down the number of allowed archetypes, technology stacks and runtime/platforms to a few supported options. For MTA to be useful on that approach at scale, there needs to be a way for organizations to model the supported runtimes/platforms and technology stacks and associate them with archetypes, and from there, streamline and simplify the analysis process for migrators.
Proposed solution
Open Questions