Closed soham4abc closed 3 months ago
@soham4abc apologies for the confusion. After discussing with @shawn-hurley we think it's best to support PODMAN_BIN
for a while longer. Can we first check for this var? If CONTAINER_TOOL
is also set, we will want to use that instead.
@soham4abc apologies for the confusion. After discussing with @shawn-hurley we think it's best to support
PODMAN_BIN
for a while longer. Can we first check for this var? IfCONTAINER_TOOL
is also set, we will want to use that instead.
Sure... Do you want me to revert the changes to ```PODMAN_BIN?
@soham4abc We still want to move forward with CONTAINER_TOOL
. But for the sake of compatibility, we should probably check for PODMAN_BIN
and CONTAINER_TOOL
together. If both are set, use CONTAINER_TOOL
. If only one or the other, use that.
@soham4abc We still want to move forward with
CONTAINER_TOOL
. But for the sake of compatibility, we should probably check forPODMAN_BIN
andCONTAINER_TOOL
together. If both are set, useCONTAINER_TOOL
. If only one or the other, use that.
hey @eemcmullan I have made the changes can you please have a look and test on your end!
@eemcmullan can you please have a look and run the CI tests?
@shawn-hurley can you please have a look at the changes and provide your reviews?
This PR changes the environment variable
PODMAN_BIN
toCONTAINER_TOOL
as kantra falls back to docker if podman is not present, this variable name makes much more sense.
@dagood Please do have a look and provide any necessary feedback for the same.
Closes #168