Closed jrideout closed 5 years ago
Stay consistent with the TNEF / MAPI docs (if feasible; I don't know if the docs themselves are consistent on this), and just add a comment pointing out that PidTag or PidLid are just MAPI types with a different naming convention?
Just a thought; no strong opinion either way.
To stay consistent we'd want to rename the existing MAPI_* types to PIDTAG, which would probably break existing applications. Given that, I'm going to just convert it all to MAPI and then add a comment like you suggest.
Changes in #45
To stay consistent we'd want to rename the existing MAPI_* types to PID_TAG, which would probably break existing applications.
I see. We can consider doing that in a controlled manner over a timespan of a few releases at some later time I guess.
PidTag or PidLid are the naming conventions MS uses, so I used the same when adding a bunch of properties outside the core MAPI types.
I'm thinking though, we just call everything
MAPI_
for consistency. We'll want to decide this before publishing 1.3.