Closed jugmac00 closed 4 years ago
I think E221 should be enforced, but not religiously. To me, the MAPI constants definitions are clearer with the "column - based approach". I think Flake8 had a way to omit a particular check for a whole module too? As in here? https://stackoverflow.com/a/54454433/1256394 . Would that work? EDIT: hm I see there's other code there so maybe per-line noqa is better.
TIL: There is an option to ignore a specific violation per file, but not in the file itself, but via configuration - looks a bit clunky to me and it does not seem to be bug-free either https://gitlab.com/pycqa/flake8/-/issues/517
I'd prefer the line specific annotation.
per-file-ignores =
project/__init__.py:F401
setup.py:E121
other_project/*:W9
Flake8 is currently only used in GitHub actions.
I'd like to introduce a
tox
environment for Flake8.Currently, there would be 78 Flake8 errors when I apply very strict rules.
While the most errors are pretty straight forward to fix, before I start I both wanted to know your take on it in general and especially E221 (multiple spaces before operator).
E221 would mark following code as erroneously formatted:
https://github.com/koodaamo/tnefparse/blob/6a02c0b59497b681fecf902ab565580b9899ff10/tnefparse/mapi.py#L30-L50
So, before I start. Is applying Flake8 welcome? Is is ok to re-format above code? If not - do you prefer noqa annotations per line or ignore E221 altogether?
Is it ok to enforce Flake8 via Travis / GitHub actions?