Closed dmfenton closed 8 years ago
In dealing with pre-cached data in any provider its really less of an issue for the provider than it is an issue with koop-pgcache and optimizations there (ie query performance / optimization). Just saying there are two sides to explore, the provider, which you done via the PR and the caching and retrieval of large data.
Want me to make an issue in Koop-pgcache?
@dmfenton if it makes sense, but I think first I'd like to understand what the short comings of the current solution are in terms of benchmarks or just timed request numbers and whether its a cache issue or a provider issue or even a koop issue.
Can you provide references to a URL in koop that exhibits behavior that is "slow"?
ab -n 5 'http://koop.dc.esri.com/socrata/seattle/3k2p-39jp/FeatureServer/0/query?where=1=1&outFields=*&returnGeometry=true'
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 1604373 $>
Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
Benchmarking koop.dc.esri.com (be patient)...apr_pollset_poll: The timeout specified has expired (70007)
ab -n 5 'http://koop.dc.esri.com/socrata/seattle/3k2p-39jp/FeatureServer/0/query?where=1=1&returnCountOnly=true'
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 1604373 $>
Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
Benchmarking koop.dc.esri.com (be patient)...apr_pollset_poll: The timeout specified has expired (70007)
ab -n 5 'http://koop.dc.esri.com/socrata/seattle/3k2p-39jp/FeatureServer/0'
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 1604373 $>
Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
Benchmarking koop.dc.esri.com (be patient).....done
Server Software:
Server Hostname: koop.dc.esri.com
Server Port: 80
Document Path: /socrata/seattle/3k2p-39jp/FeatureServer/0
Document Length: 0 bytes
Concurrency Level: 1
Time taken for tests: 8.516 seconds
Complete requests: 5
Failed requests: 0
Non-2xx responses: 5
Total transferred: 494 bytes
HTML transferred: 0 bytes
Requests per second: 0.59 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 1703.296 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 1703.296 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 0.06 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 6 6 0.1 6 6
Processing: 6 1697 3783.2 6 8465
Waiting: 6 1697 3783.2 6 8465
Total: 11 1703 3783.2 11 8471
@dmfenton so explain what happened here?
In the last test is returned in 1.7 seconds, so it was less than your 2 limit? :)
The basic FeatureServer request, which doesn't need to return any data is taking 1.7 seconds. Seems pretty long.
The other requests timeout even when I set the limit to 30 seconds.
This works but performance could be a lot better. Still, closing.
Concept
As a user I can access a performant feature service that is proxying: http://data.seattle.gov/resource/3k2p-39jp.json
Details
cc @astauffer