I can confirm by removing a field that may contain a plus sign anywhere in the value: "ANNOYINGFIELD": "123+10".
This is related to this issue and iso-datestring-validator. The fix in koop is to check the first character for a problem string in date-type-utils.js. Whereas this issue is a plus sign anywhere in the string which can conflict to other date formats with timezone info.
I've been able to handle this on my end by modifying the isDate function in data-type-utils,js with a includes check specific to '+' - its specific to my data so not very helpful in a global sense.
As the title states. If a field contains a plus sign koop will return a regular expression error:
{ "error": { "code": 500, "message": "Invalid regular expression: /^(?!0{4}+0{2}+0{2})((?=[0-9]{4}+(((0[^2])|1[0-2])|02(?=+(([0-1][0-9])|2[0-8])))+[0-9]{2})|(?=((([13579][26])|([2468][048])|(0[48]))0{2})|([0-9]{2}((((0|[2468])[48])|[2468][048])|([13579][26])))+02+29))([0-9]{4})+(?!((0[469])|11)+31)((0[1,3-9]|1[0-2])|(02(?!+3)))+(0[1-9]|[1-2][0-9]|3[0-1])$/: Nothing to repeat", "details": [ "Invalid regular expression: /^(?!0{4}+0{2}+0{2})((?=[0-9]{4}+(((0[^2])|1[0-2])|02(?=+(([0-1][0-9])|2[0-8])))+[0-9]{2})|(?=((([13579][26])|([2468][048])|(0[48]))0{2})|([0-9]{2}((((0|[2468])[48])|[2468][048])|([13579][26])))+02+29))([0-9]{4})+(?!((0[469])|11)+31)((0[1,3-9]|1[0-2])|(02(?!+3)))+(0[1-9]|[1-2][0-9]|3[0-1])$/: Nothing to repeat" ] } }
I can confirm by removing a field that may contain a plus sign anywhere in the value: "ANNOYINGFIELD": "123+10".
This is related to this issue and iso-datestring-validator. The fix in koop is to check the first character for a problem string in date-type-utils.js. Whereas this issue is a plus sign anywhere in the string which can conflict to other date formats with timezone info.
I've been able to handle this on my end by modifying the isDate function in data-type-utils,js with a includes check specific to '+' - its specific to my data so not very helpful in a global sense.