search

kopiro / homebridge-tapo-camera

Homebridge plugin for TP-Link TAPO security cameras
ISC License
127 stars 11 forks source link

TypeError: callback.call is not a function #102

Closed ppapajohn closed 10 months ago

ppapajohn commented 10 months ago

Hi all, Thank you very much for fixing the password encryption bug. After upgrading to version 2.3.3 I get the following error which makes the plugin go on an infinite loop of restarting (practically it stays online for 10, 15 seconds, and then restarts):

[12/5/2023, 6:01:34 AM] [homebridge-tapo-camera] Launched child bridge with PID 382777 [12/5/2023, 6:01:34 AM] Registering platform 'homebridge-tapo-camera.tapo-camera' [12/5/2023, 6:01:34 AM] [homebridge-tapo-camera] Loaded homebridge-tapo-camera v2.3.3 child bridge successfully [12/5/2023, 6:01:34 AM] Loaded 0 cached accessories from cachedAccessories.0E7DF481EFD1. [12/5/2023, 6:01:34 AM] Homebridge v1.7.0 (HAP v0.11.1) (homebridge-tapo-camera) is running on port 54797. [12/5/2023, 6:01:35 AM] IPC01 5652 is running on port 38927. [12/5/2023, 6:01:35 AM] Please add [IPC01 5652] manually in Home app. Setup Code: 888-66-888 [12/5/2023, 6:01:35 AM] IPC02 383B is running on port 35763. [12/5/2023, 6:01:35 AM] Please add [IPC02 383B] manually in Home app. Setup Code: 888-66-888

/usr/lib/node_modules/homebridge-tapo-camera/node_modules/onvif/lib/events.js:309 callback.call(this, err, data, xml); ^ TypeError: callback.call is not a function at Cam. (/usr/lib/node_modules/homebridge-tapo-camera/node_modules/onvif/lib/events.js:309:14) at parseSOAPString (/usr/lib/node_modules/homebridge-tapo-camera/node_modules/onvif/lib/utils.js:108:3) at IncomingMessage. (/usr/lib/node_modules/homebridge-tapo-camera/node_modules/onvif/lib/cam.js:297:4) at IncomingMessage.emit (node:events:526:35) at endReadableNT (node:internal/streams/readable:1589:12) at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:82:21)

In advance, thank you once again for the amazing work and plugin.

Best Regards, Panos

ppapajohn commented 10 months ago

I just noticed that issue #100 is exactly the same, so I think you can delete this. Apologies for not noticing this earlier.