search

koppor / jabref

Collection of simple for JabRef issues. Please submit PRs to https://github.com/jabRef/jabref/.
https://github.com/jabRef/jabref/
MIT License
8 stars 13 forks source link

Implement ChipView for the search #341

Open koppor opened 6 years ago

koppor commented 6 years ago

Currently, we distinguish between basic and grammar-based search.

It was proposed to reimplement the GUI for search as follows:

papers search.

Keywords: search autocompletion javafx

See also discussion at https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/pull/7391#issuecomment-768453050

koppor commented 3 years ago

In case the query is a valid lucence syntax, use that query. If the query is not a Lucene query, just take each keyword and do an OR search. -- Maybe indicate with a backbround color that the search syntax is not correct.

calixtus commented 2 years ago

@koppor created a pr draft about the basic integration of a lucene parser in jabref (#8206).

btut commented 2 years ago

If the query is not a Lucene query, just take each keyword and do an OR search.

I would argue that an AND search would be more appropriate, except if one field appears twice. So:

author=koppor author=btut -> OR search author=koppor title=JabRef -> AND search

koppor commented 2 years ago

@btut Do you know what Lucene / Elastic search is doing when using "as is"? (Maybe with a reference?)

ThiloteE commented 2 years ago

I would just like to shortly state here that there have been voices to implement fine grained extended search capabilities in issues: #4237, #6185 and #7996. If and how these would be compatible to the chip-view type of search outlined here and in #7806 or the field autocompletion feature in #7423 is something to ponder about.

I just don't want these other topics to be overlooked, forgotten, since Koppor/Jabref and Jabref/Jabref are two different repositories.

btut commented 2 years ago

@btut Do you know what Lucene / Elastic search is doing when using "as is"? (Maybe with a reference?)

From the lucene documentation: The OR operator is the default conjunction operator.

koppor commented 2 years ago

Note that there was another UI proposal: https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/issues/7423. Maybe the proposal at https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/issues/7423 is a next step, if we got https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/pull/8356 merged.