Open kornai opened 8 years ago
rubber gumi gummis guma 914 u N material, flexible, CAUSE[mark NOTAT surface]
This is a bug, probably the definition of eraser 'radír' not rubber 'gumi'. Am I using the right version of 4lang git/machine/4lang/4lang ??
On Apr 2, 2016 1:49 AM, "Andras Kornai" notifications@github.com wrote:
rubber gumi gummis guma 914 u N material, flexible, CAUSE[mark NOTAT surface]
This is a bug, probably the definition of eraser radír' not rubbergumi'. Am I using the right version of 4lang git/machine/4lang/4lang ??
The machine repo is obsolete, the current version of 4lang is under git/4lang/4lang
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
I'm not sure how to transfer the issue to the correct repo, but the 4lang files in the two are identical.
That's weird. I can't check it out right now, but @makrai any idea how this is possible? On Apr 2, 2016 9:10 AM, "Andras Kornai" notifications@github.com wrote:
I'm not sure how to transfer the issue to the correct repo, but the 4lang files in the two are identical.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/kornai/4lang/issues/74#issuecomment-204664100
Counts: András, I'm afraid you also included comments. Considering only definitions (in the 4lang repo)
40 NOTHAS
24 NOTAT
11 NOTIN
2 NOTPART
2 NOTCAUSE
rubber gumi... When I wrote definitions, the method was to define (English) words in the sense they are used in Longman definitions. I agree that there is something to clean up here, but I don't think it is related to negation.
two repos: I see difference in 420 lines, which is still few, but better than nothing.
Last, turning to the point: these work-arounds like NOTHAS were introduced when there were only two partitions. Now we have the formal tools to negate binary relations, e.g. radír: ... AT -0-> not ..., and we can extend the use of lack to the lack of possessions (poor <-1- HAS -2-> money -0-> lack)
The same skewed relation we see with binaries is seen in `lack' stuff, now formulated as NOTHAS (44 instances). We have NOTIN (9) NOTAT (26) but we have a few I don't understand, such as NOTCOP (11) and NOTPRED (4), what are these? There seem to be some that occur even fewer times, such as NOTINSTRUMENT (1 instance), NOTPARTOF (2), and one that probably is a grep accident:
feature vona1s differentia cecha 3017 u N ' NOTICE, important, typical, CAUSE[recognize]