It looks like the flag was left out of the transition to the new args parser in a95b3c285db85696999bf7f7eefd051680491d30. The following addition is sufficient to get the code running again:
diff --git a/src/main.rs b/src/main.rs
index fd93c31..6199377 100644
--- a/src/main.rs
+++ b/src/main.rs
@@ -75,6 +75,9 @@ fn run() -> Result<(), BoxError> {
.arg(Arg::with_name("dirty-alpha")
.long("dirty-alpha")
.help("Keep RGB data of fully-transparent pixels (makes larger, lower quality files)"))
+ .arg(Arg::with_name("premultiplied-alpha")
+ .long("premultiplied-alpha")
+ .help("Alternative compression mode that lowers quality of semi-transparent colors. Warning: at low qualities it may create black artifacts in transparent areas."))
.arg(Arg::with_name("color")
.long("color")
.default_value("ycbcr")
However, the output it generates is invalid per ISOBMFF (ISO 14496-12:2020) § 8.11.12.1 since it requires "Zero or one" iref boxes and the output generated has 2.
The dirty-alpha workaround I've developed turned out to work much better than I expected, so I've decided to drop support for premultiplied alpha instead.
It looks like the flag was left out of the transition to the new args parser in a95b3c285db85696999bf7f7eefd051680491d30. The following addition is sufficient to get the code running again:
However, the output it generates is invalid per ISOBMFF (ISO 14496-12:2020) § 8.11.12.1 since it requires "Zero or one"
iref
boxes and the output generated has 2.