Open jameysharp opened 5 years ago
This whole thing for immutable
is a heuristic. If there's no explicit max-age
set, then clients can guess. I guess that immutable
responses are fresh for longer than other responses.
It's very likely that I mixed up seconds and milliseconds, since I've changed the units at some point. The intention was one day.
The readme says that "
immutableMinTimeToLive
is a number of milliseconds", but it's compared against values which are in seconds (e.g.Math.max(defaultMinTtl, (expires - dateValue) / 1000)
) and returned frommaxAge
which on other paths returns values in seconds.In my opinion, the implementation is reasonable so it's the documentation which is wrong; what do you think?
The default value is
24 * 3600 * 1000
, which is either one day or 1,000 days depending on the answer to this question. I don't see anything in the RFC guiding how clients should behave ifmax-age
is not set butimmutable
is. Since "hours seconds milliseconds" order makes a little more sense than "hours seconds days", I'm guessing it was supposed to be one day, in which case the default value is wrong too.While you're looking at the documentation for this option: