Closed ChrisRackauckas closed 1 year ago
I haven't wanted to touch this because I don't know the involved packages. How deprecated are they? Would this be breaking to anyone?
I know these packages were a large part of why @korsbo made Latexify to begin with.
Both are deprecated and have their own Latexify recipes so these not only do nothing, but also throw warnings while doing nothing.
Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +10.21
:tada:
Comparison is base (
a6c71ef
) 72.15% compared to head (2dd069f
) 82.36%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
This looks fine to me. Thanks 🙂
Since this was released as a breaking release, https://github.com/korsbo/Latexify.jl/issues/258 still needs to be fixed since no one will get this release until all packages have upgraded to it.
aah, right. There's a mismatch between what triggers require (DiffEqBase) and what then gets loaded (ParameterizedFunctions). Should be easy enough to fix.
I still don't mind dropping support for these pretty ancient packages though, so we can let this one stand.
These have been deprecated for a long time. The ParameterizedFunction one doesn't need to exist anyways because it's just MTK since 2020. So these can just be deleted and that fixes issues like https://github.com/korsbo/Latexify.jl/issues/258