Fixes a check for generating a large op with with scripts under and o…

[cupojoe]

…ver when in fractions and other displays not in the main level

@kostub This seems to work fine with all the generated math in the example app. The use case is to have the following:

instead of this:

[cupojoe]

@kostub any chance you could take a look at this one?

[kostub]

Isn’t this only supposed to be the case in display style?

[cupojoe]

Not according to our subject matter expert. Bounds can go either below/above or next to the operator but should be consistent. And for limits, seems to be the case they always go below.

[cupojoe]

@kostub does it make sense? Or do you think this be an option? I can think of a way to add this an option.

[kostub]

I checked on ShareLatex and Pages (on Mac) and the current implementation is correct:

I tried these two variations:

\[\frac{\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty}}{x+1}\]
\[\frac{\displaystyle{\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty}}}{x+1}\]

This displays as:

as expected. I believe both options already work correctly.

[cupojoe]

This makes sense. I went back to our SME, and she is ok with it being on the side for other positions outside of the display line. I wonder why this choice of render. I will close for now, hopefully the design team won't get too hung up on this.