Closed marshall-lee closed 9 years ago
You want to split place of Eyefile and place where stored pid, sock?
But if you set one EYE_HOME, and run multiple leyes, sock,pid files would rewrited
Why should I run multiple leyes with one EYE_HOME
? Typical usage of leye
(as i thought) is to use separate home dirs for different projects. Or I can just run multiple leyes with one EYE_HOME
but different EYE_V
if i need. No problem!
I think this is ok, but you loose all handies of shell leye usage. Which was the goal of leye.
you would need to write everywhere: cd /project/ && EYE_HOME=/some/path leye info
, instead of cd /project && leye info
better just to use EYE_V: EYE_V=some_project eye info
Upd: I understand now capistrano problem, need to think how to better do it
Yes, it forces me write EYE_HOME=...
. So what? The option EYE_HOME
already exists and if someone wants to somehow use it then he will have to type it all the time anyway :smiley:. And since the option already exists it must work properly or should be disabled to use with leye
.
Спасибо! :dolphin:
What if we by default would store pid and sock in: dir(eye_file) + "/.eye"
, this should solve capistrano problem, .eye can be shared
This is good and also it's more conventional than storing that files in current directory. Global eye
uses ~/.eye
but leye
uses PWD/.eye
— that's good!
But users already running leye
in production should be somehow warned about this transition and probably the wiki article about usage with capistrano should be written.
By the way, what happens when eye
gem is updated? Need to manually restart it? Then there's no problem with this transition I think.
not sure that leye using anyone, it was added recently, just as toy.
With major changes need to: eye q
, gem install eye
, eye l ...
, between minor versions not needed (and most major). With this change of sockpath, it needed. I write if it need in changes: https://github.com/kostya/eye/blob/master/CHANGES.md
I've started using leye in production now as a way of managing multiple eye instances for different applications on the same node. I create a file under /etc/default for each eye instance that contains the relevant ENV variables. So I can . /etc/default/eye.app1
and then run leye commands for that app. What is EYE_V?
@grimm26 EYE_V
is just a number.
For example, if home directory is always the same (~/.eye
) then
EYE_V=1
and EYE_V=2
would make eye use ~/.eye/pid1
+~/.eye/sock1
and ~/.eye/pid2
+~/.eye/sock2
respectively.
See https://github.com/kostya/eye/wiki/What-is-loader_eye-and-leye and https://github.com/kostya/eye/blob/master/lib/eye/local.rb
pushed new 0.6.4 gem, where you can use --eyefile options, and changed leye dir to PWD/.eye (https://github.com/kostya/eye/blob/master/CHANGES.md#064), so require to restart any leye process while gem update. (leye quit && gem install eye && leye load)
Hi!
I really think that eye
home
directory andEyefile
must be decoupled. So if we haveEYE_HOME
when runningleye
then we should not infer eye home directory fromEyefile
path.It also can be seen that existing logic is buggy: when passing
EYE_HOME
to leye the.eyeconfig
path is infered fromhome
butsocket_path
andpid_path
are not because of@dir
memoization.If interested my initial goal was to store eye's pid and socket in shared directory created by capistrano. Am I doing anything wrong?