Closed psdsam closed 6 years ago
I'm out of the loop on what's going on here. What does this function do, and why should we put it in the CBIV branch if its modifying CBPSBinary?
Christian
Cleaned this up--moving from master to a branch.
Variance for CBPS binary.
Marc
From: christianfong [notifications@github.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 1:59 AM To: kosukeimai/CBPS Cc: Subscribed Subject: Re: [kosukeimai/CBPS] ATT for hdCBPS (#5)
I'm out of the loop on what's going on here. What does this function do, and why should we put it in the CBIV branch if its modifying CBPSBinary?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/kosukeimai/CBPS/pull/5#issuecomment-310579379, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AI21oOlG72ph9WocDmpHjY9qgZlPbR8Rks5sG1RZgaJpZM4ODFhC.
@ratkovic I think it would be helpful if you could explain to @christianfong exactly what you've done and update the documentation too. Thanks.
Also, @christianfong This merge is requested by @psdsam who wants to add high dimensional CBPS to the cbiv
branch, which for whatever reason contains the initial changes regarding hdCBPS. It should have been a separate branch but oh well...
@ratkovic : I have several proposed changes to the binary variance function. I will send details to you via email.
@psdsam: You can put your changes in CBIV if you want (especially since it doesn't affect the CBIV files), but I see that there is a request to merge CBIV into master. CBIV is not ready to merge into master, and will not be ready for some time. If you want to merge and submit to CRAN ahead of CBIV, you will need your own branch.
Adding ATT into hdCBPS