Closed brauliobo closed 7 months ago
On the disk below:
Model: ATA Samsung SSD 870 (scsi) Disk /dev/sdd: 2048GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: gpt Disk Flags: Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 1049kB 1024MB 1023MB fat32 primary 2 1024MB 48.4GB 47.4GB btrfs primary 3 48.4GB 2048GB 2000GB btrfs primary
I've tested creating bcachefs on the 2 last partitions, here it is the df -h output:
df -h
/dev/sdd2 41G 2,0M 40G 1% /mnt/ss2t/root /dev/sdd3 1,7T 3,3M 1,7T 1% /mnt/ss2t/home
Compared to btrfs, that is 9-11% less free space:
/dev/sdd2 45G 5,8M 44G 1% /mnt/ss2t/root /dev/sdd3 1,9T 5,8M 1,9T 1% /mnt/ss2t/home
Why that much overhead?
Copygc reserve.
Having a real reserve means -ENOSPC is reliable.
On the disk below:
I've tested creating bcachefs on the 2 last partitions, here it is the
df -h
output:Compared to btrfs, that is 9-11% less free space:
Why that much overhead?