Caution: this is very close to the existing rule
(2) DetMod @ (Det @ N) ===> (DetMod @ Det) @ N that is responsible for not (all dogs) ===> (not all) dogs. These two rules are very close for instances like almost (all dogs) ===> (almost all) dogs where almost easily gets same JJ pos.
Currently, (2) is used only for DetMod with RB pos.
Now there is a rule that digs
Det
from np-Mods
and attaches at the top of NP.Caution: this is very close to the existing rule
(2) DetMod @ (Det @ N) ===> (DetMod @ Det) @ N
that is responsible fornot (all dogs) ===> (not all) dogs
. These two rules are very close for instances likealmost (all dogs) ===> (almost all) dogs
wherealmost
easily gets sameJJ
pos. Currently, (2) is used only for DetMod withRB
pos._Originally posted by @kovvalsky in https://github.com/kovvalsky/prove_SICK_NL/issues/2#issuecomment-785137719_