Closed vrom911 closed 4 years ago
@vrom911 Interesting idea! I like having hit wip
command, which does exactly what you described 👍
I agree that the case with master
is a bit tricky and worth thinking about 🤔 I see a few options:
<name>/wip
branch (as you proposed)
hit
); can't have multiple different wip
commits from master
WIP
commit@chshersh , great summary!
For me personally the master
use case is rarer, as I usually working on a particular issue and want to make a WIP commit. However, for sure the airbag should be in place. I would go for the first option, as I don't usually care about the collision between my wip
branches. But the second one is totally legit. So need to think more about each one.
I need this very often, so I usually do:
Would it be useful to have this logic somewhere? I only concerned about how to handle cases with
master
. I guess we need to somehow create a wip branch, but not sure...