🚑 fixes graphql parser --use-standard-collections --use-union-operator --use-annotated

[bpsoos]

resolves #1941

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (202c0b8) to head (7a33cd8).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #2016 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 100.00% 100.00% ========================================= Files 38 38 Lines 4197 4199 +2 Branches 967 967 ========================================= + Hits 4197 4199 +2 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator/pull/2016/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Koudai+Aono) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator/pull/2016/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Koudai+Aono) | `99.66% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Koudai+Aono#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[codspeed-hq[bot]]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #2016 will create unknown performance changes

_{Comparing bpsoos:fix/1941-graphql-options (7a33cd8) with main (202c0b8)}

Summary

🆕 29 new benchmarks ⁉️ 29 dropped benchmarks

:warning: Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	main	bpsoos:fix/1941-graphql-options	Change
🆕	test_main_all_of_ref	N/A	52.2 ms	N/A
🆕	test_main_autodetect	N/A	72.4 ms	N/A
🆕	test_main_external_definitions	N/A	55.9 ms	N/A
🆕	test_main_inheritance_forward_ref	N/A	138 ms	N/A
🆕	test_main_inheritance_forward_ref_keep_model_order	N/A	139.4 ms	N/A
🆕	test_main_json_reuse_enum_default_member	N/A	99.2 ms	N/A
🆕	test_main_jsonschema_complex_any_of	N/A	71.5 ms	N/A
🆕	test_main_jsonschema_external_files	N/A	53.1 ms	N/A
🆕	test_main_jsonschema_field_include_all_keys	N/A	71.2 ms	N/A
🆕	test_main_jsonschema_id	N/A	59.7 ms	N/A
🆕	test_main_jsonschema_multiple_files	N/A	96 ms	N/A
🆕	test_main_jsonschema_nested_deep	N/A	87.6 ms	N/A
🆕	test_main_jsonschema_special_field_name	N/A	73.9 ms	N/A
🆕	test_main_nested_directory	N/A	279.1 ms	N/A
🆕	test_main_root_id_jsonschema_self_refs_with_local_file	N/A	100.1 ms	N/A
🆕	test_main_root_id_jsonschema_self_refs_with_remote_file	N/A	99.5 ms	N/A
🆕	test_main_strict_types	N/A	93.4 ms	N/A
🆕	test_main_strict_types_all_with_field_constraints	N/A	88.3 ms	N/A
🆕	test_force_optional	N/A	161.5 ms	N/A
🆕	test_main	N/A	148.6 ms	N/A
...	...	...	...	...

:information_source: Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

[bpsoos]

Hello @koxudaxi,

Sorry for the large diff. Most of it is just refactor. The actual fix is contained in these commits.

The rest of the changes included (only refactor of tests/test data):

• separated test_main.py into independent test files (test_main_openapi.py, test_main_jsonschema.py, etc.)
• grouped the expectations in tests/data/expectation/main into groups (openapi, jsonschema, json, etc.)
• updated the tests to use the path of the grouped expectations

My aim here was to reduce directory sizes and LoC/file, in order to improve maintainability.

Let me know what you think!

[koxudaxi]

@bpsoos Thanks for the great PR. Sorry, the test coverage was broken, but I have fixed it. The PR has quite a few conflicts. Can you please fix them?

[bpsoos]

@koxudaxi I think I have fixed all of the conflicts